<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Censorship on Rafiul Alam</title>
    <link>https://alamrafiul.com/tags/censorship/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Censorship on Rafiul Alam</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://alamrafiul.com/tags/censorship/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Streisand Effect: How Censorship Backfires Spectacularly</title>
      <link>https://alamrafiul.com/blogs/streisand-effect/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://alamrafiul.com/blogs/streisand-effect/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 2003, photographer Kenneth Adelman was documenting coastal erosion in California. He took 12,000 aerial photographs of the coastline for the California Coastal Records Project.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of those photos happened to capture Barbra Streisand&amp;rsquo;s Malibu mansion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The photo had been downloaded exactly &lt;strong&gt;six times&lt;/strong&gt;. Two of those downloads were by Streisand&amp;rsquo;s lawyers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then Streisand sued Adelman for $50 million, demanding the photo be removed from the public website.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-backfire&#34;&gt;The Backfire&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lawsuit made headlines. Suddenly, everyone wanted to see the photo that Barbra Streisand was trying to hide.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
