Sebastian lives in his mother’s basement. You know this.
What’s down there? Computers, certainly. Posters, probably. But what else? What doesn’t he talk about? What history lives in that space?
You never fully find out. And that’s precisely why he feels real.
Because implication creates depth. The unexplained suggests vastness. What you don’t show is often more powerful than what you do.
Let’s explore how to build rich backstories through hints, environmental details, and strategic omission.
The Power of the Unexplained
The Iceberg Principle
Hemingway’s theory: Show 10% above water. Know 100% beneath.
For characters:
- Reveal a fraction of their history
- Imply the rest through details
- Trust the audience to imagine
Why this works:
- Engagement: The audience fills gaps with their imagination
- Depth: Unrevealed history creates sense of more
- Realism: Real people have histories you never fully know
- Mystery: The unexplained is intriguing
Stardew Valley excels at this: Characters mention things that are never fully explored, creating depth through suggestion.
Environmental Storytelling for Characters
Your environment tells your story. What’s in someone’s room reveals who they are.
Sebastian’s Basement: A Case Study
What we see:
- Computers (coder, spends time alone)
- Dim lighting (prefers darkness/isolation)
- Posters (interests, aesthetics)
- Tucked away from family (physical and emotional distance)
What we don’t see but can infer:
- Why he chose the basement (or was it chosen for him?)
- How long he’s been there
- What it looked like before
- What he’s building/creating
The environment raises questions it doesn’t answer—and that creates intrigue.
The Technique: Meaningful Objects
Place objects that imply story:
Penny’s trailer:
- Small, cramped
- Humble compared to other homes
- Neat despite Pam’s drinking
- Books everywhere (escape through reading)
Objects tell story:
- Economic struggle (trailer vs. houses)
- Penny’s coping (books, cleanliness as control)
- Contrast with mother (order vs. chaos)
None of this is explicitly stated. All of it is shown.
Dialogue Hints: What’s Said (and What’s Not)
The Art of Ellipsis
Bad exposition: “My father left when I was seven, which caused deep abandonment issues that manifest in my relationships…”
Good implication: “I don’t really talk about my dad.” (Later) “He left when I was young.” (Much later) “I guess I have trust issues.”
What’s not said:
- Exact age
- Circumstances
- Full emotional impact
- Current relationship (if any)
The gaps invite interpretation.
Conversational Breadcrumbs
Shane mentions:
- His job at Joja is awful
- He lives with his aunt
- He has a goddaughter
- His friends died (mentioned once, never detailed)
We’re never told:
- How his friends died
- Why he lives with Marnie
- What happened to Jas’s parents
- His life before Pelican Town
These gaps create:
- Sense of tragic past
- Weight of unspoken grief
- Character depth through absence
The “I Don’t Want to Talk About It” Moment
When characters deflect:
“What happened?” “…I’d rather not get into it.”
This is:
- Realistic (people avoid painful topics)
- Intriguing (we want to know)
- Respectful (not everything is owed to us)
Example: Penny
Player: “Tell me about your dad.” Penny: “I… don’t really remember him. He left a long time ago.”
Notice:
- Not “I don’t want to talk about it” (too on-the-nose)
- Just… deflection through lack of information
- Implies both pain and distance
We fill the gap: Did he abandon them? Did he die? Was he abusive? The game doesn’t say. The ambiguity creates engagement.
The Incomplete Anecdote
The Technique: Start Stories, Don’t Finish Them
Real conversations include incomplete anecdotes:
“Oh, that reminds me of the time—actually, never mind.” “I used to [do thing], but that was before…” “My friend used to say… well, it doesn’t matter.”
This creates:
- Realism (people self-censor)
- Intrigue (what were they going to say?)
- Depth (implied history)
Example (hypothetical Stardew dialogue):
Sebastian: “I almost moved to the city once. But then… well, circumstances changed.”
What’s not explained:
- When?
- Why did he want to leave?
- What circumstances?
- Does he regret staying?
The incompleteness is the point.
Character Backstory Grid: What to Reveal vs. Conceal
The Strategic Revelation Framework
Tier 1: Surface Details (Reveal)
- Job, hobbies, observable traits
- Safe topics
- What they’d tell an acquaintance
Tier 2: Personal History (Hint)
- Family dynamics
- Past relationships
- Formative events
- Mentioned briefly, not explored
Tier 3: Core Wounds (Imply)
- Deepest fears
- Unprocessed trauma
- Shameful moments
- Shown through behavior, rarely stated
Tier 4: Mystery (Never Reveal)
- Ambiguous details
- Contradictions never resolved
- Questions without answers
- Create sense of unknowability
Example: Sebastian
Tier 1 (revealed): Coder, motorcyclist, friend of Sam and Abigail Tier 2 (hinted): Uncomfortable with Demetrius, wants to leave town Tier 3 (implied): Feels overshadowed, fears insignificance Tier 4 (mystery): What exactly does he do in that basement? What’s his full history with his biological father?
The Contradiction That Hints at Depth
Unexplained Contradictions Create Intrigue
When characters:
- Say one thing but do another
- Have inconsistent reactions
- Act out of character occasionally
Don’t explain it away—leave tension.
Example: Haley
Surface: Shallow, vain, dismissive Hint: Mentions her parents are traveling Implication: Is her materialism overcompensation? Loneliness? Contradiction: Sometimes shows surprising depth
The game doesn’t resolve this fully. The contradiction makes her feel complex.
Showing Wounds Through Scars
The Metaphor: Scars vs. Open Wounds
Open wound: Fresh, bleeding, visible, raw → Active trauma, currently processing
Scar: Healed over, visible but closed, sensitive when touched → Past trauma, integrated but not gone
Narrative application:
Bad: Character constantly talks about trauma Good: Character has behavioral scars that hint at old wounds
Example: George
Scar: Bitter, dismissive Hint: Wheelchair, isolated, wife is his main connection Implication: Past injury/illness, loss of mobility, frustration at dependence
Never fully explained, but the scar tissue is visible in behavior.
The Technique: Objects with History
Chekhov’s Gun Inverted
Chekhov’s Gun: If you show a gun, it must be fired.
Inverted: Show objects that are never “used” but imply history.
Examples:
Penny’s book collection: Never catalogued or explained, but shows lifelong reading habit
Shane’s Joja uniform: Worn regularly, never discussed as significant, but represents daily defeat
Sebastian’s motorcycle: Mentioned, rarely seen, represents escape fantasy
These objects aren’t plot devices—they’re character texture.
What’s in the Basement? Using Unexplored Space
The Power of Off-Screen Life
Characters have lives you don’t see:
- What does Sebastian do all day in that basement?
- What does Penny do when she’s not teaching?
- Where does Linus go during winter?
The answer: The game doesn’t fully tell you.
And that’s good.
Because it means:
- Characters exist beyond your observation
- They’re not NPCs waiting for you
- They have autonomous existence
The unexplored space creates the illusion of life beyond the frame.
When to Explain vs. When to Hint
The Guidelines:
Explain when:
- It directly affects current plot
- Character chooses to reveal it
- Understanding is necessary for emotional impact
Hint when:
- It’s context, not plot
- Character would realistically withhold it
- Mystery serves the character
Never explain when:
- Ambiguity is more powerful
- Full knowledge would diminish impact
- The unknown creates engagement
Example: Shane’s friends
What we know: They died. He’s devastated. What we don’t know: How, when, exact circumstances.
Should the game explain?
No, because:
- The loss is what matters, not the details
- Grief feels more universal when not over-specified
- Shane’s pain is about absence, not circumstances
The Danger of Over-Explaining
When Wikis Ruin Mystery
The problem with complete backstory documentation:
You write 10 pages of backstory → characters feel fully knowable → mystery evaporates → characters feel smaller
Better approach:
You write 10 pages of backstory → reveal 2 pages → hint at 3 → keep 5 pages in your head only
Why:
- You know the character fully (comes through in consistency)
- Audience gets intriguing fragments (creates engagement)
- Mystery remains (character feels deeper)
The iceberg: Show the tip, know the whole.
Practical Takeaway
To create backstory through hints:
1. Write the full history (for yourself)
- Know your character completely
- Understand their past
- Map their wounds and joys
2. Identify revelation tiers
- Surface: What’s safe to share
- Personal: What requires trust
- Core: What they rarely discuss
- Mystery: What you never explain
3. Plant environmental details
- Objects that imply history
- Spaces that reveal character
- Details that raise questions
4. Use incomplete dialogue
- Start anecdotes, don’t finish
- Mention things in passing
- Deflect from pain points
5. Trust the audience
- They’ll fill gaps
- They’ll imagine depth
- They don’t need everything explained
6. Leave contradictions
- Don’t resolve every tension
- Let characters be complex
- Ambiguity creates intrigue
The Final Mystery
Sebastian’s basement contains:
- Computers and code
- Posters and personality
- A motorcycle he dreams of riding away on
- And everything else you imagine
The game gives you enough to build a picture.
But not so much that the picture is complete.
Because the most powerful backstories are the ones that live partially in shadow.
Where the hints give shape.
But the darkness suggests depth.
What’s in Sebastian’s basement?
Everything he is. Everything he was.
And everything the game wisely chooses not to tell you.
Next: Flawed Characters You Root For - Why we love the town drunk